1865/2014 Const. P. Mst. Sadia & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
1865/2014 Const. P. Mst. Sadia & others (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & others (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 12-FEB-19
Petitioner in Pursuance advertisement applied for the post of Oriental Teacher and Drawing Teacher .They claimed that on conducting the written test were declared Successful candidate. They approached for obtaining offer order but could not. State council informed that Since irregularities were found in the test no result of test was announced. However, only offer letter issued them on contract basis which were canceled and appointed .pursuant to an advertisement did not confer any right to be appointed to the posts in question to entitle the selectees to a writ of mandamus or any other writ compelling the authority to make the appointment, for the simple reason that the whole process has been scrapped and nothing is left to be filled up. merely issuance of offer order is no ground to claim appointment order as the respondents Since the Government also has the right to cancel the recruitment process. In the light of above facts and the observation made by the Honble Supreme Court in the case of Muhammad Arif & others vs. Province of Sindh & others (supra), Civil petition No 186k /2013 consequently, all the Constitution Petitions merit no consideration and are dismissed with no order as to cost.