17/2003 Civil Revision Mst.Aisha Kazi and others (Applicant) V/S Anwar Ahmed (died),through his L.Rs. (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2019

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

17/2003 Civil Revision Mst.Aisha Kazi and others (Applicant) V/S Anwar Ahmed (died),through his L.Rs. (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 12-FEB-19

The registration of a document does not help in proving the contents of the document. This burden is to be discharged separately under the Evidence Act, 1872 and/or the Qanun-e-Shahadat Order, 1984. Mere alleged registration does not prove the contents of the instrument. The quantum of evidence to establish a testamentary paper must always depend upon the circumstances of each case. Burden to prove execution lies on those propounding a Will to affirm positively execution of the Will. Opposite side should not be burdened with onus to prove that Will had not been executed or that it was a forged one.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

17/2003 Civil Revision Mst.Aisha Kazi and others (Applicant) V/S Anwar Ahmed (died),through his L.Rs. (Respondent)

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will