👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

1641/2020 Const. P. Sonya Durrani (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtBanking & Corporate2021

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

1641/2020 Const. P. Sonya Durrani (Petitioner) V/S NAB & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Kalhoro, Senior Puisne Judge(Author) Order Date: 13-OCT-21

accused in reference, were extended a relief of pre and post arrest bail by this Court. NAB not satisfied with the order challenged the same before the Honorable Supreme Court where remanding the case back to this Court for deciding the afresh in the light of guidelines laid down in the cases reported in PLD 2018 SC 40, PLD 2005 SC364 and PLD 2019 SC 250. Case mainly revolves around allegations against accused Agha Siraj Durani, , for committing corruption and corrupt practices and illegal means accused in the reference, said to be his family members, associates, agents, domestic workers, gunmen, etc., are identified as Benamidar/ostensible owners of the properties actually owned and possessed by him. We come to the case of family members of accused Agha Siraj Khan Durani (his wife, a son and three daughters). It is noted, they have been identified as Benamidar owners of certain properties like plots, flats ,bungalows, vehicles .s. Allegation to provide finance to purchase the properties is against him, and not against his family members. there is no evidence or even allegation that his family members were either privy to his alleged acts of depravity, aiding and abetting him. Petition of SoniaDurrani (C.P.No.D-1641/2020) is allowed and bail is confirmed.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Admission must be clear, specific and unambiguous

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Const. P. 6075/2024 (D.B.) Amir Rehman V/S Govt of Sindh & Others

2026 SHC KHI 1397 · Sindh High Court · 2026

1630/1998 Suit NOTHERN POLYTHENE LTD (NPL) (Plaintiff) V/S NAT BANK OF PAK & ORS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2013

71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

3/2013 I. A Soofi Rice Mills & Others (Appellant) V/S N.B.P & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018