163/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN S/O GHULAM SARWAR & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)
163/2021 Spl.Anti.Ter.A. MUHAMMAD ZEESHAN S/O GHULAM SARWAR & ORS (Appellant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Order Date: 24-OCT-22
No ransom demand has been proved by the prosecution through any tangible evidence. For instance, there is no CDR to link the appellants to the offence. No one saw the appellants throw the body of the deceased in the canal and the last seen evidence without proper identification of the appellants cannot be relied upon which in any event is only circumstantial evidence and is to be viewed with extreme caution. No toxicology report was produced to show that the child had even been drugged.