162/2021 II.A. Muhammad Anwar S/o Muhammad Saeed (Appellant) V/S Mst. Fouzia Qasim and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2021

Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
162/2021 II.A. Muhammad Anwar S/o Muhammad Saeed (Appellant) V/S Mst. Fouzia Qasim and others (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar(Author) Order Date: 12-OCT-21 I am afraid this contention cannot be accepted in view of Imtiaz Ali V/S Atta Muhammad and another, PLD 2008 S.C. 462, wherein it was held by the Honble Supreme Court that the appeal, having been filed after one day of the period of limitation, had created valuable right in favour of the respondents, and no sufficient cause was found for filing the appeal beyond the period of limitation. The delay of only one day was not condoned by the Honble Supreme Court in the cited case. In the above circumstances, the impugned order does not suffer from any illegality or infirmity. Accordingly, the appeal and listed application are dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020