153/2022 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) V/S SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

153/2022 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) V/S SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 12-NOV-24

It is a well-settled principle of law that where the direct evidence fails the corroborative piece(s) of evidence will be of no help to the prosecution as portrayed by the learned APG. Reliance can be made to the case of ???Abid Ali & 2 others 2011 SCMR 208??? wherein it was held:- ???Although where the ocular account has been disbelieved the recovered articles which are carrying corroborative value cannot substantiate the charge against the appellants because, in the absence of direct evidence, corroborative evidence by itself cannot bring home the charge of murder against the appellants.???

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

153/2022 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) V/S SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28