153/2022 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) V/S SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
153/2022 Spl.Anti.T.Acq.A THE STATE THROUGH P.G SINDH (Appellant) V/S SYED UMAR KAMAL (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Salahuddin Panhwar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 12-NOV-24 It is a well-settled principle of law that where the direct evidence fails the corroborative piece(s) of evidence will be of no help to the prosecution as portrayed by the learned APG. Reliance can be made to the case of ???Abid Ali & 2 others 2011 SCMR 208??? wherein it was held:- ???Although where the ocular account has been disbelieved the recovered articles which are carrying corroborative value cannot substantiate the charge against the appellants because, in the absence of direct evidence, corroborative evidence by itself cannot bring home the charge of murder against the appellants.???
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020