👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

15/2019 Judicial Companies Misc. GULISTAN SPINNING MILLS LIMITED & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S NA (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCompany Law2023

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

15/2019 Judicial Companies Misc. GULISTAN SPINNING MILLS LIMITED & OTHERS (Applicant) V/S NA (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 30-OCT-23

Ss. 280, 281, 282, 283 & 285(8)---Scheme of Arrangement---Rights of parties---Petitioners sought approval of understandings and arrangements reached at between borrower and financers/creditors---Validity---High Court could not sit as Court of appeal over and above wisdom disclosed by borrower and creditors while agreeing to certain terms of repayment, provided it was within the frame of company law and within the contours of Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001---To such extent High Court was bound to watch and commercial wisdom of participant of the Scheme could not be pierced by a Bench who might have its own opinion---Company jurisdiction of High Court in such matters was peripheral and supervisory and not of an appellate authority---By taking into confidence all stakeholders, a policy was devised to settle and pay liabilities of all secured creditors in a befitting manner---To achieve such goal, charged assets of petitioner company were put to sale through Assets Sale Committee consisting of representatives of banks---High Court set aside all objections and approved the Scheme of Arrangement---Petition was allowed, in circumstances

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Award can be set aside with consent of parties

PLJ 2014 SC 950 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Alienation of Property Judgment

PLJ 2011 Karachi 120 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2011

299/2021 H.C.A Asif Siddik Adam (Appellant) V/S Siddiki Fun Trust & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2023

4/2011 H.C.A Salehbhoy through LRs (In person) (Appellant) V/S M/s. Pak Maniar Investment (Pvt.) Limited and others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

223/2008 H.C.A Abdul Rasheed & Ors. (Appellant) V/S Abdul Ghani & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2011