👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

1465/2013 Const. P. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ KALOTA (Petitioner) V/S NAFEES AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtProperty & Rent2017

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

1465/2013 Const. P. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ KALOTA (Petitioner) V/S NAFEES AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 30-NOV-17

Admission of alleged default by tenant in any previous litigation or even in this case cannot be relied upon. Admission could only be of facts and cannot be of law. The law takes effect when applied on facts. Admission of law, if any, has to pass through the test prescribed and required by law itself. If a person conceded to have defaulted being ignorant of law such is no admission unless approved by law as the law takes its course when applied on facts which may suggest otherwise than what allegedly conceded or admitted in facts Advocates: Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS)

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

PLJ 2018 SC 504 · Sindh High Court · 2018

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Review of Order of Board

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

PLJ 2009 · Sindh High Court · 2009

Termination of Agency of Contract

PLJ 2007 · Sindh High Court · 2007