1465/2013 Const. P. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ KALOTA (Petitioner) V/S NAFEES AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2017

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
1465/2013 Const. P. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ KALOTA (Petitioner) V/S NAFEES AHMED & OTHERS (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 30-NOV-17 Admission of alleged default by tenant in any previous litigation or even in this case cannot be relied upon. Admission could only be of facts and cannot be of law. The law takes effect when applied on facts. Admission of law, if any, has to pass through the test prescribed and required by law itself. If a person conceded to have defaulted being ignorant of law such is no admission unless approved by law as the law takes its course when applied on facts which may suggest otherwise than what allegedly conceded or admitted in facts Advocates: Abdul Wajid Wyne(ADVO-2246-SBC-KHI),Naeem Suleman(ADVO-7422-SBC-KHS)
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020