145/2018 Cr.Rev Umed ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
145/2018 Cr.Rev Umed ALI (Applicant) V/S THE STATE & others (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro(Author) Order Date: 12-JAN-26 Civil disputes do not bar prosecution under the Illegal Dispossession Act and any summary dismissal on such grounds is legally untenable, as forcible dispossession requires a judicial inquiry and cannot be shielded behind pending civil litigation; Trial Courts are duty???bound to determine prior possession rather than evade jurisdiction on the pretext of civil remedies, since concurrent civil proceedings offer no defence against criminal liability and any summary rejection without proper inquiry violates the mandate of Section 5 of the Act.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020