14/2021 Conf.Case REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) V/S NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2022

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)

14/2021 Conf.Case REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) V/S NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Order Date: 27-SEP-22 No direct enmity or ill will has been suggested by the appellants against the complainant or any of the officials who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained unshattered during the cross-examination. Even otherwise, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C. during recovery proceedings.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

14/2021 Conf.Case REF. MADE BY SPL. COURT II CNS KARACHI (Appellant) V/S NAEEM AKHTAR @ ALI HAIDER & 2 ORS (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief