👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

139/2010 Suit Nasim Beg (Plaintiff) V/S The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Defendant)

Sindh High CourtBanking & Corporate2014

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Share on WhatsApp

139/2010 Suit Nasim Beg (Plaintiff) V/S The Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Defendant) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 28-APR-14

Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----Ss. 42 & 54---Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984), S.224(2)---Discretion of court as to declaration of status or right---Bar to such declaration---Trading by director, officers and principal shareholders of a company---Show-cause notice under S.224(2) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984---Suit for declaration and permanent injunction challenging issuance of show-cause notice to plaintiff by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (SECP), under S.224(2) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984---Maintainability of such suit---Contention of the plaintiff was inter alia that he had not realized any tenderable and/or other gain and was not therefore liable to tender any amount under S.224 of the Companies Ordinance, 1984---Held, that declaration sought by plaintiff was not in respect of any legal character of the plaintiff---Very fact that plaintiff had submitted a detailed reply to the show-cause noticed issued by the SECP, was contrary to his claim in the plaint and in the said reply plaintiff had not claimed that the defendants had acted illegally, in a mala fide way or that they were not competent to issue impugned notice under S.224 of the Companies Ordnance, 1984---Fact that plaintiff had submitted to the jurisdiction of the SECP unconditionally amounted to accepting jurisdiction of SECP to issue notice under the Companies Ordinance, 1984---Plaintiff should have appeared before the competent authority for personal hearing, which he had avoided---Plaintiff had not sought declaration as to his own rights and status; and declaratory relief could only be granted in respect of legal character which was not under threat in the present case---Plaintiff was therefore neither entitled to declaration or permanent injunction---Suit being incompetent and not maintainable, was dismissed in circumstances.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Admission must be clear, specific and unambiguous

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Const. P. 6075/2024 (D.B.) Amir Rehman V/S Govt of Sindh & Others

2026 SHC KHI 1397 · Sindh High Court · 2026

1630/1998 Suit NOTHERN POLYTHENE LTD (NPL) (Plaintiff) V/S NAT BANK OF PAK & ORS (Defendant)

Sindh High Court · 2013

71/2008 Suit.B SONERI BANK LTD (Plaintiff) V/S CLASSIC DENIM MILLS PVT LTD (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2012

3/2013 I. A Soofi Rice Mills & Others (Appellant) V/S N.B.P & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court · 2018