1370/2026 Const. P. Mst. Neelofar Shakeel (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
1370/2026 Const. P. Mst. Neelofar Shakeel (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 05-MAY-26
The petitioner, being an elderly person aged over 72 years, is further entitled to expeditious relief, and any delay in release of pension and gratuity would amount to undue hardship and denial of her lawful sustenance. The request for grant/restoration of double pension, if admissible under the applicable rules, also falls within her legal entitlement and must be examined and implemented strictly in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the disposal of the petition in terms of the statement made by Respondent-KMC is legally sound, as it binds the respondents to fulfill their admitted obligation within the stipulated timeframe. Failure to do so would expose the respondents to appropriate legal consequences, including enforcement and contempt proceedings, as the petitioner cannot be deprived of her accrued rights on account of administrative delay or inaction.