👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

1305/2025 Const. P. Abdul Majid Sahito & another (Petitioner) V/S Irum Bukhari & Ors (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtConstitutional Law2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

Share on WhatsApp

1305/2025 Const. P. Abdul Majid Sahito & another (Petitioner) V/S Irum Bukhari & Ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 16-APR-26

In view of the foregoing, this Court is of the view that the Petitioners have failed to establish any legal infirmity, jurisdictional defect, or violation of fundamental rights in respect of the impugned promotions. The petition is found to be based on disputed questions of fact and service interpretation, which are not amenable to determination in constitutional jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. 12. The petition, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed, along with pending applications. However, the parties are left to bear their own costs. 13. These are the reasons of our short order of even date whereby the instant petition along with pending application(s) were dismissed.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

No case if EOI is not submitted on time

PLJ 2108 SC 208 · Sindh High Court · 2019

Commercial and Service Activities of Civil Aviation Authority

PLJ 2017 SC 558 · Sindh High Court · 2017

Responsibility of NHA in road Accidents

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Legal Status of Sale Deed could not be resolved in Rent Proceedings

Sindh High Court · 2015

Decree of Khula on unregistered Nikahnama

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014