13/2019 Criminal Appeal Dilbar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2022

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
13/2019 Criminal Appeal Dilbar (Appellant) V/S The State (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi(Author) Order Date: 02-AUG-22 No direct enmity or ill will can be suggested among appellants with the complainant who participated in recovery proceedings during cross examination and therefore in the circumstances the police officials were good witnesses and could be relied upon if their testimony remained un-shattered during the cross-examination. However, the provision of Section 25 of the CNS Act has provided the exclusion of Section 103 Cr.P.C
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020