129/2026 Const. P. Kashif (Petitioner) V/S Faryal Waseem & Another (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)
129/2026 Const. P. Kashif (Petitioner) V/S Faryal Waseem & Another (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 31-MAR-26
Applying these principles, in the present case, constitutional jurisdiction cannot be invoked to reopen or revise interlocutory orders or proceedings where an adequate statutory remedy of appeal is available, and the petitioner has not demonstrated any patent illegality or ultra vires action by the lower forum. 12. In view of the above, the impugned order is well-reasoned and passed with strong justification considering the ground realities. The petitioner has failed to establish any grounds for interference under Article 199 of the Constitution, and for the aforesaid reasons, this petition is dismissed along with all pending applications. However, with no order as to costs.