116/2019 Criminal Appeal SYED NIZAM MOHIUDDIN RAFAI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH DAG (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2019

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
116/2019 Criminal Appeal SYED NIZAM MOHIUDDIN RAFAI (Appellant) V/S THE STATE THROUGH DAG (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Amjad Ali Sahito(Author) Order Date: 14-MAY-19 Appellants Challenged the Judgment whereby the appellants were convicted u/s. 420 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six (6) years and fine of Rs.26 lacs, also convicted for an offence u/s.468 PPC and sentenced them to suffer R.I. for six (6) years .Manager Operation HBL stating therein that accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah in active connivance of his other accomplices obtained the credential/secret information and full particulars of A/c No.22877100245003 of HBL, WAPDA Town Branch Gujranwala titled Imran Afzal Khokhar. Thereafter, he arranged fake cheque book requisition slip on which he made forged signature of Imran Afzal Khokhar and with active connivance of accused Sajid Ali, a banker holding duties of clearing, collection of bills posting and cheque deposit and posting of cheque book requisition at HBL, WAPDA Town Branch Gujranwala processed the same for issuance of a fresh cheque book. Later on, with the connivance of his another accomplice Ghulam Ghous also a banker holding duties of cheque book to the account holder. Accused Syed Junaid Ali Shah received the cheque book request process, HBL WAPDA Town Branch Gujranwala whose duty was to deliver the he cheque book to the account holder. Appellant Syed Nizam Mohiuddin Rafai that he is not dangerous, desperate and hardened criminal as well as he is not a previous convicted, Page 9 of 10 therefore, the sentence awarded to him may be reduced into the period already undergone, is concerned, . Instant appeal is dismissed on merits
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020