👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

11/2016 II.A. Abdul Aziz (Appellant) V/S Abdul Kareem & others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtProperty & Rent2022

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

11/2016 II.A. Abdul Aziz (Appellant) V/S Abdul Kareem & others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 23-MAY-22

Sale deed of appellant as being enjoyed by appellant cannot be set-aside automatically as the defence of the appellant is protected being buyer without notice of any dispute. As stated above it has to be proved independently through impartial evidence failing whereof the aforesaid provisions of law would protect the title of appellant. Section 27(b) is for enforcing performance against those who acquired title with knowledge of previous agreement/contracts, whereas section 41 of Transfer of Property Act protect title for those who acquired title without knowledge of previous litigation. Since it is a case of cancellation of sale deed I am of the view that section 41 of Transfer of Property Act is more appropriate for its application

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

PLJ 2018 SC 504 · Sindh High Court · 2018

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Review of Order of Board

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

PLJ 2009 · Sindh High Court · 2009

Termination of Agency of Contract

PLJ 2007 · Sindh High Court · 2007