👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

108/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Shoukat Ali Solangi & others (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCivil Law2019

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

108/2018 R.A (Civil Revision) Shoukat Ali Solangi & others (Applicant) V/S P.O Sindh & others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 15-APR-19

The jurisdiction of a Civil Court cannot be completely ousted against the officials on account of any colourful exercise of powers. The mandatory test is to be seen by consequential provisions. The jurisdiction to be exercised by these officials should strictly be within the four corners of the statue and not otherwise. In case it is so pleaded, it needs probe and unless such questions are dealt with accordingly after an enquiry and probe, plaint cannot be summarily rejected as has been done in this case. I am not commenting about the merit of the case which may go either way, but it is the manner in which a plaint was dealt with.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Suit for Damages on Malicious Prosecution can be filed within one year

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014

Party can be added at any stage of the Trial

Sindh High Court · 2014

Permission to produce documents under order 13 rule 2

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Right to sue in case of Benamidar has six years limitation

PLJ 2010 Karachi 132 · Sindh High Court · 2010

There is difference between Power of Attorney and Will

PLJ 2008 Karachi 121 · Sindh High Court · 2008