👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

← All Case Highlights

Judgment on Custody of Minor

PLD 2004 Lahore 395 and 2009 MLD 33, which .rulings were distinguish · Lahore High Court

This case was about a custody dispute over a young boy named Bilal Ahmad following his father's death. After the father died, the boy's mother, Mst. Asima, lived with her in-laws but was later forced out of the house, while the paternal grandmother retained custody of the child. The mother went to court multiple times to recover custody, initially under the Criminal Procedure Code and later under the Guardians and Wards Act. Lower courts had ruled against her partly based on the five-year-old child's own statement that he preferred living with his grandmother. However, on appeal, the District Judge reversed this and ordered the child be returned to his mother. The grandmother then challenged that decision before the Lahore High Court.

The High Court dismissed the grandmother's petition and upheld the mother's right to custody. The judge personally interviewed the child and found he had been influenced to say negative things about his mother, which she considered psychologically harmful. The court emphasized that under Islamic law, a mother's right to custody takes precedence over a paternal grandmother's, and that a child's welfare, including emotional and mental wellbeing, must guide custody decisions. The court also noted the mother's sacrifices and continued efforts to regain her son.

This case matters because it reinforces that courts must prioritize a child's overall welfare, including emotional health, and affirms the mother's preferential right to custody under Islamic law.

یہ مقدمہ ایک کمسن بچے بلال احمد کی تحویل کے تنازع سے متعلق تھا جو اس کے والد کی وفات کے بعد پیدا ہوا۔ والد کی وفات کے بعد بچے کی والدہ، مسماة عاصمہ، اپنے سسرال والوں کے ساتھ رہتی رہیں لیکن بعد میں انہیں گھر سے نکال دیا گیا، جبکہ دادی نے بچے کی تحویل اپنے پاس رکھی۔ والدہ نے بچے کی تحویل واپس حاصل کرنے کے لیے کئی بار عدالت سے رجوع کیا، پہلے ضابطہ فوجداری کے تحت اور بعد میں گارڈینز اینڈ وارڈز ایکٹ کے تحت۔ ماتحت عدالتوں نے ان کے خلاف فیصلہ دیا تھا، جس کی ایک وجہ پانچ سالہ بچے کا یہ بیان بھی تھا کہ وہ اپنی دادی کے ساتھ رہنا پسند کرتا ہے۔ تاہم اپیل میں ڈسٹرکٹ جج نے اس فیصلے کو کالعدم قرار دیتے ہوئے بچے کو والدہ کے حوالے کرنے کا حکم دیا۔ اس پر دادی نے اس فیصلے کو لاہور ہائی کورٹ میں چیلنج کیا۔

ہائی کورٹ نے دادی کی درخواست خارج کر دی اور والدہ کے تحویل کے

Read the full judgment →

WhatsAppFacebookX / Twitter
🖼️ Download social media graphic