👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

← All Case Highlights

Government of Balochistan, Industries Department V. Muhammad Yousaf and others,

CLC 2018 396 · Balochistan High Court

This case involved a long-running dispute over compensation for land acquired by the Balochistan government to build a rainwater drain in Hub. In 2001, a civil judge set the compensation rate, which was later increased by the High Court in 2008. The government appealed to the Supreme Court, but that appeal was dismissed in 2015 for being filed too late, and a subsequent review petition was also dismissed in 2016.

Meanwhile, the landowners had already filed an execution application back in 2000 to recover the compensation, but it was put on hold because the Supreme Court had issued a stay on the judgment while the appeal was pending. After the Supreme Court finally dismissed the appeal and review, the landowners filed a fresh execution application in 2016. The government argued this was filed too late and objected to the execution process.

The Balochistan High Court rejected the government's objections. It held that since the first execution application had been pending and was only adjourned due to the Supreme Court's stay order, and since there was no evidence that the stay was lifted before the final 2015 decision, the new execution application was filed within the legal time limit. Relying on earlier Supreme Court precedents, the court ruled that the execution proceedings were valid and dismissed the government's appeal, meaning the landowners could proceed to recover their compensation.

یہ معاملہ ہب میں بارشی نالے کی تعمیر کے لیے بلوچستان حکومت کی جانب سے حاصل کی گئی زمین کے معاوضے پر ایک طویل عرصے سے جاری تنازع سے متعلق ہے۔ 2001 میں ایک سول جج نے معاوضے کی شرح مقرر کی، جسے بعد ازاں 2008 میں ہائی کورٹ نے بڑھا دیا۔ حکومت نے اس کے خلاف سپریم کورٹ میں اپیل دائر کی، لیکن وہ اپیل 2015 میں تاخیر سے دائر کیے جانے کی بنا پر خارج کر دی گئی، اور اس کے بعد دائر کی گئی نظرثانی کی درخواست بھی 2016 میں مسترد کر دی گئی۔

اس دوران زمین کے مالکان نے معاوضے کی وصولی کے لیے 2000 میں ہی عملدرآمد کی درخواست دائر کر دی تھی، لیکن سپریم کورٹ کی جانب سے اپیل زیرِ التوا ہونے کے باعث فیصلے پر حکمِ التوا جاری کیے جانے کی وجہ سے اسے روک دیا گیا تھا۔ جب سپریم کورٹ نے بالآخر اپیل اور نظرثانی دونوں کو خارج کر دیا، تو زمین کے مالکان نے 2016 میں عملدرآمد کی ایک نئی درخواست دائر کی۔ حکومت نے موقف اختیار کیا کہ یہ درخواست میعاد گزر جانے کے بعد دائر ک

Read the full judgment →

WhatsAppFacebookX / Twitter
🖼️ Download social media graphic