👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

Qatl-e-Amd punishment in case of partial compromise

Supreme Court of PakistanCriminal Law2012
Share on WhatsApp

Citation Name : 2011 SCMR 128 SUPREME-COURT Side Appellant : MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ Side Opponent : State -S. 302(b)—Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)—Qatl-e-amd– -Leave to Appeal was granted to accused by Supreme Court only to consider whether death sentence awarded to him was justified in view of the compromise made by two out of the three legal heirs of the deceased and further to consider whether accused was below the age of 18 years on the date of occurrence, as he had claimed to be 19 years old in his statement recorded under S. 342, Cr.P.C. by Trial Court

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Review Jurisdiction of Supreme Court

PLJ 2020 SC ( · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2020

Fake Bank Accounts Case

PLJ 2019 SC (Cr.C.) 71 · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2019

PLJ 2018 SC 391

PLJ 2018 SC 391 · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2018

Second FIR of the same incident is barred

PLJ 2018 SC 391 [Original Jurisdiction] · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2018

Mumtaz Qadri Case Judgment

SCMR 1718) that the real and effective law in · Supreme Court of Pakistan · 2016