PLJ 2000
Lahore
1106
Present:
MALIK MUHAMMAD QAYYUM,
J. HUMAYUN ELAHI SHEIKH and 10 others-Petitioners
versus
FEDERATION OF
PAKISTAN
through MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND
TRADE, ISLAMABAD etc.-Respondents
W.P. No! 560 of 2000, heard on 9.3.2000.
(i) Constitution of
Pakistan
(1973)--
—Art. 199-Order contrary to principles of natural justice-Effect-Decisions
taken by Managing Committee of petitioner Association were annulled by
Director Trade Organisation being not in accordance with Memorandum
and Articles of Association of petitioner organisation-Validity--No action
detrimental to interest of any person can be taken by statutory
functionary except after allowing him opportunity of being heard which is
minimum requirement of natural justice-Decision of Director Trade
Organisation was liable to be struck down on that ground alone.
[P. 1108] A
(ii) Trade Organizations Ordinance, 1961 (XLV of 1961)--
—-S. 15-Constitution of
Pakistan
(1973), Art. 199-Tenure of Chairman of
Trade Organization expiring—Now new Chairman elected—Effect—
Managing Committee of such Trade Organization as per terms of
Memorandum and Articles of Association would be competent to take
over affairs of Trade Organization and not the Vice-Chairman as directed by Director Trade Organization—Where impugned order was contrary to provisions of law as also natural justice it was not necessary for petitioner
to invoke alternative remedy provided by law-Order of Director Trade
Organization to the extent of denuding Managing Committee of its power
was declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect-
Managing Committee however, was directed to hold election of Chairman
within two weeks from Court's direction.
[Pp. 1108 & 1109] B & C
Mr. All Sibtain Fazli,
Advocate for Petitioners.
Kh. Saeez-ud-Zafar,
Deputy Attorney General for
Pakistan
for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. Tariq Shamim,
Advocate for Respondent No. 3.
Date of hearing: 9.3.2000.
JUDGMENT
This petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973 arises under the following circumstances:
2.
Petitioner No. 11, All Pakistan Textile Mills Association
commonly known as APTMA is a registered trade organization within the
meaning of Trade Organization Ordinance, 1961, Its affairs are being
managed by a managing committee which comprises of 27 members and has
two years tenure. However, the Managing Committee is required to elect a
Chairman of the association for a period of one year. Admittedly Petitioner
No. 1 was elected as Chairman for the year 1998/99. His tenure having
expired the matter was taken up by the Managing Committee which by its
resolution dated 18.10.1999 decided that pending election of the Chairman
the affairs will be managed by the Managing Committee of APTMA and
Petitioner No. 1, Humayun Elahi Sheikh would be its convener. This decision
taken by the committee was annulled by the Director Trade Organization on 13.1.2000 wherein he after referring to an order of Sindh High Court in Suit No. 1346 of 1999 observed that the resolution passed in the meeting held on
18.10.1999 regarding selection of Humayun Elahi Sheikh as convener of
APTMA was not in accordance with Memorandum and Articles of
Association of APTMA and therefore, the same stood cancelled. This order of
Director Trade Organization has been challenged through this petition
having been filed by 10 Members of the Managing Committee.
3.
Mr. Ali Sibtain Fazli, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner
has argued that the impugned order of the Director Trade Organization
cancelling the resolution passed by the Managing Committee is wholly void
inasmuch as the petitioners were not afforded any opportunity of being
heard. The second contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Director Trade Organization has misdirected himself in observing
that the resolution dated 18.10.1999 was not in accordance with the
Memorandum and Articles of Association of APTMA inasmuch as according
to Article 54 of the Articles of Association of Petitioner No. 11 after the
expiry of the tenure, the Chairman shall automatically cease to hold the
office and has to hand over the charge of the office to the Managing
Committee if the election is not held. In the submission of the learned
counsel there was no justification for the Director Trade Organization to
direct that the affairs of the Association be taken over by the Vice-Chairman.
4.
Kh. Saeed-uz-Zafar, learned Deputy Attorney General has raised
a preliminary objection as to the maintainability of this petition on the
ground that the petitioners have an equally fficacious relief available 10
them in the form of appeal to the Federal Government under Section 15 of
the Trade Organization Ordinance, 1961 and as such this Constitutional
petition is not aintainable. It was further argued by the Seamed Deputy
Attorney General and Mr. Tariq Shamim, Advocate, learned counsel for
Respondent No. 3 that there was no power vesting in the Managing
Committee to have appointed a convener to take over the affairs of the
Association and the resolution was violative of the provisions of
memorandum and articles of association and was, therefore, rightly
cancelled by the Director Trade Organization.
5.
It is by now well settled that no action detrimental to the interest
of any person can be taken by a statutory functionary except after allowing
him an opportunity of being heard which is he minimum requirement, of
natural justice. On this ground alone decision of Director Trade
Organization is liable to be struck down,
6.
There is also force in the contention of the learned counsel for the
petitioners that in case where the tenure of the Chairman has expired and a
new Chairman is not elected under Article 54 of Memorandum and Articles
of Association, it is the Managing Committee which has to take over the
affairs of the Trade Organization and not the Vice-Chairman as directed by
the Director Trade Organization. Article 54 reads as under - "54. (i) On the expiry of fixed tenure period the Chairman will
automatically cease to be the Chairman and will hand over the
charge of his office to the newly elected Chairman or to the
Managing Committee if the elections have not been held."
7.
Faced with this situation learned Deputy Attorney General and
learned counsel for Respondent No. 3 have argued that at least to the extent
of appointing a convener the resolution was
ultra vires
the memorandum and Articles of Association. This position is not contested by the learned
counsel for the petitioners who says that Humayun Elahi Sheikh Petitioner
No. 1 has since resigned as a convener.
8.
It follows that in absence of fresh election to the office of
Chairman the control of Trade Organization vests in the Managing
Committee which is obliged to hold elections immediately. The observation of the Director Trade Organization that the resolution dated 18.10.1999 is in
conflict with the Memorandum and Articles of Association is not correct
except to the extent of the appointment of convener which is no more a live
issue in view of resignation of Hamayun Elahi Sheikh.
9.
So far as the preliminary objection raised by the learned Deputy
Attorney General and learned counsel for the respondent is concerned the
same does not deserve any serious consideration inasmuch as it stands
demonstrated on the record that the impugned order is contrary to the
2000 An
TEXTILE (JHANG) LIMITED
v. Govr.
OF
PAKISTAN
Lah. 1109
(Malik Muhammad Qayyum, J.)
provisions of law as also natural justice. In such circumstances, it is not
necessary for the petitioner to invoke the alternative remedy provided by
law. Furthermore, the remedy of appeal in the present case appears to be
illusory.
As a result of what has been stated above, this petition is allowed to
the extent that order dated 13.1.2000 cancelling the resolution dated
18.10.1999 to the extent of denuding the Managing Committee of its power
under Article 54 of the Memorandum and Articles of Association is declared
to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect. The Managing
Committee shall proceed to hold the elections to the office of Chairman
within two weeks from today.
(A.A.T.'
Petition accepted.This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error,
let us know.