99/2012 II.A. Abdul Rahim Memon (Appellant) V/S Mst. Amna Shaikh & ors (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)
99/2012 II.A. Abdul Rahim Memon (Appellant) V/S Mst. Amna Shaikh & ors (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 10-APR-21
Whatever is deposed by the attorney, he deposed it on behalf of the principal on instruction and hence nothing could be taken away on the count that it was hearsay -Plaintiff/respondent has also examined one of the witnesses of the agreement whereas the other had expired and hence according to Qanoon-e-Shahadat Order, 1984, it was otherwise proved through the evidence available on record. On the other hand the appellant examined himself only without corroboration of any other witnesses. Even defendants No.2 and 3 did not turn up to examine themselves and/or to support the appellant/defendant No.1.