6481/2024 Const. P. Shahnawaz Abro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
6481/2024 Const. P. Shahnawaz Abro (Petitioner) V/S Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 30-APR-26
The reliance placed on parity with Secondary School Teachers is also misconceived, as each cadre is governed by its own distinct policy framework. Equality under the Constitution does not mandate identical treatment of dissimilar service structures, especially where financial and policy considerations differ and fall within the exclusive domain of the executive authority. 13. The judgment relied upon by the petitioner is distinguishable on the facts and does not advance his case in the absence of a corresponding legal entitlement under the applicable rules. 14. In view of the above discussion, we find no illegality, arbitrariness, or constitutional infirmity in the impugned policy or the actions of the respondents. The petition, being devoid of merit, is accordingly dismissed along with pending application(s). However, in the circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.