612/2013 Cr.Bail Muhammad Aslam (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2013

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

612/2013 Cr.Bail Muhammad Aslam (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 02-JUL-13

The contents under Section 489-F for the perusal as reproduced as also the contents of the FIR clearly manifest the dishonesty. For reaching the conclusion as to whether offence under Section 489-F is bail out or not the applicants attitude towards the cheques need not to be further established as he has failed to inform the concerned Manager of the Bank regarding the alleged misappropriation of cheque which was allegedly stolen. The applicant has not been able to this fact satisfactorily as to why this information was not given to the Manager. It also creates an impression that before issuing cheque to the complainant he might have managed to lodge this non-cognizance report to save his skin from future dispute. With these reasons I am clear in my mind that the applicant is not entitled for concession of bail and this bail application is dismissed.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

612/2013 Cr.Bail Muhammad Aslam (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28