51/2009 Suit.B Pakistan Kuwait Investment Co. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Three Star Hosiery Mills Ltd (Defendant)

Sindh High Court2016

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp
51/2009 Suit.B Pakistan Kuwait Investment Co. (Plaintiff) V/S M/s. Three Star Hosiery Mills Ltd (Defendant) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 25-NOV-16 The purpose of such authentication and certification in terms of subsection (8) of Section 2 of the Act is that it signifies the authenticity of document such as statement of account which in absence of such certificate cannot be presumed to be correct. Bankers Book Evidence Act provides the presumption of the correctness to such statement of account and is considered to be correct if it is certified by the officer as contemplated under section 2(8) of the Bankers Book Evidence Act,1891. Though it may have been attempted to be cured on the basis of additional statement of account which appears to have been certified yet the authority of the officer is only in relation to instituting a suit, verification of plaint, engaging a Counsel etc. in terms of Board resolution. This authority based on the board resolution cannot be stretched down to the frame of Section 2(8) of the Bankers Book Evidence Act. In the connected matter of Pak Kuwait Investment v. Active Apparel International where the shareholders claimed to be the same, the leave was granted on this score alone. The auditors report may have its strength but such material document ought to have been filed along with the plaint since the defendant have no chance to rebut the same as has been filed along with the replication.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020