445/2024 Cr.Bail Ghulam Baqir Manghanhar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

445/2024 Cr.Bail Ghulam Baqir Manghanhar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 02-AUG-24

It is a settled principle of law that the bail plea is to be decided based on material available on record tentatively and the deeper appreciation of evidence is not permissible under the law. However, the allegations against the applicant are serious and there could be no redemption or compensation for the victim because he would have to live with the worst scars that one could imagine. However, as per the version, during the investigation medical examination of the victim Ali Abbas was conducted but such a report is negative even though a DNA report is negative, therefore, when the exact language of the definition of the offense is placed in juxtaposition, a ground of further inquiry in terms of sub-clause 2 of section 497 Cr.P.C. is made out.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

445/2024 Cr.Bail Ghulam Baqir Manghanhar (Applicant) V/S The State (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28