👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

409/2014 Const. P. MST. RABIA NOOR (Petitioner) V/S SHAHZAD SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2014

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar

Share on WhatsApp

409/2014 Const. P. MST. RABIA NOOR (Petitioner) V/S SHAHZAD SHAH & OTHERS (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Nazar Akbar Order Date: 28-MAY-14

Constitution of Pakistan---- ---Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Recovery of children---Scope---Petitioner was wife of respondent and she had been divorced---Petitioner/mother had already approached Sessions Court under S. 491, Cr. P. C for the same relief---Age of children was nine and seven years and petitioner could not claim her right of Hizanat/ custody of children, who were in the custody of their father being their natural guardian---Custody of children with their father could not be treated as illegal as he was responsible for their upbringing as a natural guardian---Petitioner/mother should file petition under Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 to claim the custody or visiting rights of children---Complaint to Station House Officer against husband for having custody of children did not mean that extraordinary circumstances had arisen for invoking the constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---No case was made out for invoking jurisdiction of High Court for recovery/production of children in the court---Petitioner had equally, efficacious and alternate remedy under Guardians and Wards At, 1890 and she might file guardian petition if so advised as Guardian Judge had power of recovery of minors and regulating their interim custody---Constitutional petition was not maintainable which was dismissed in circumstances. Mst. Nadia Perveen v. Mst. Almas Noreen and others PLD 2012 SC 758 rel.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2019 Cr.C. (Note) 114 · Sindh High Court · 2019

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28 · Sindh High Court · 2018