👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

395/2006 Const. P. Israr Ul Haq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Zohra Jabeen & Ors (Appellant)

Sindh High CourtConstitutional Law2017

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

395/2006 Const. P. Israr Ul Haq & Ors (Appellant) V/S Mst. Zohra Jabeen & Ors (Appellant) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan(Author) Order Date: 27-FEB-17

The petitioners through instant constitutional petition has challenged the concurrent finding of facts by the learned courts below, whereby the Rent Controller allowed the fair rent case of the respondent, which order was subsequently upheld by the Rent Appellate Court. Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was discussed. It was taken into consideration that law requires that while deciding such application the Rent Controller shall take into consideration the four factors as stated in clause (a) to (d) of subsection (1) of Section 8 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979, including the rent of similar premises situated in the similar circumstances, in the same adjoining locality, the rise in cost of construction and repair charges, the imposition of new taxes, if any, after commencement of the tenancy and the annual value of the premises, if any, on which property tax is levied. If a party succeeds in establishing through evidence the aforesaid factors, the Rent Controller is required to examine cumulative effect of all four factors as enumerated in section 8(1) for fixation of fair rent. It was discussed that where there are concurrent findings of facts recorded by the Courts below, this Court under its Constitutional jurisdiction cannot reappraise the entire evidence in the matter, as such jurisdiction besides being discretionary in nature is very limited and not plenary in nature.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

No case if EOI is not submitted on time

PLJ 2108 SC 208 · Sindh High Court · 2019

Commercial and Service Activities of Civil Aviation Authority

PLJ 2017 SC 558 · Sindh High Court · 2017

Responsibility of NHA in road Accidents

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Legal Status of Sale Deed could not be resolved in Rent Proceedings

Sindh High Court · 2015

Decree of Khula on unregistered Nikahnama

PLJ 2014 · Sindh High Court · 2014