3269/2012 Const. P. Ghulam Qadir Memon (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2012

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam

Share on WhatsApp
3269/2012 Const. P. Ghulam Qadir Memon (Petitioner) V/S The State (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui, Mr. Justice Mushir Alam Order Date: 13-DEC-12 As far as the application of Rule 172 is concerned it applies to the Auditor and cannot apply to a sub Accountant which designation was held by these petitioners at the relevant time and as such there is no question of violation of Rule 172 of the Audit Manual & Treasury Rule. This fact is categorically admitted by PW-2 in his cross examination to Mr. M.A. Qazi. It is also admitted that the duties of the Auditor are different from those of Accountant. PW-1 has also categorically admitted that as per procedure sealed authority from the Accountant General Sindh was to be sent to DAO Hyderabad where it is entered in the inward register and that these sealed authorities after their entery in the ledger used to present before the DAO who on its opening mark it to concern ADAO after checking it and then the ADAO mark it to the Senior Auditor Pensions Section. PW-2 Altaf Hussain Mangi also admitted that Rules 172, 177 and 329 of the Audit Manual & Treasury Rule does not apply to the accused/Sub Accountant.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020