2576/2025 Const. P. Dr. Saiyid Khusro Iqbal through attorney (Petitioner) V/S Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Sindh High Court2026

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

Share on WhatsApp
2576/2025 Const. P. Dr. Saiyid Khusro Iqbal through attorney (Petitioner) V/S Government of Pakistan & Others (Respondent) Sindh High Court Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Order Date: 01-APR-26 Prima facie, thus, there is no vacancy for the petitioner to claim, and no ground to question Respondent No.4???s legal authority to hold office. Therefore, the writ of quo warranto, which is remedial in nature and requires illegality or excess of authority, cannot be sustained at this stage under these circumstances. The petitioner???s counsel claims amount to a challenge on merit, which is not permissible in a quo warranto proceeding. 12. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered view that the petition filed by Dr. Saiyid Khusro Iqbal is devoid of merit, lacks any subsisting cause of action. The appointment of Respondent No.4 as Executive Member, PEMRA, is lawful, valid, and fully compliant with statutory requirements. 13. This petition along with pending application(s) is found not maintainable under article 199 of the Constitution which is hereby dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

PLJ 2024 Karachi 138 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2024

Judgment on Punjab Partition of Immovable Property Act 2012

PLJ 2023 Karachi 124 (DB) · Sindh High Court · 2023

Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act 2013 explained in a Judgment

PLJ 2022 Cr.C. (Note) 154 · Sindh High Court · 2022

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

PLJ 2020 · Sindh High Court · 2020