👋 Welcome, visitor from Columbus, US!

2038/2015 Const. P. Ashraf Suleman (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ (South), Karachi & others (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtProperty & Rent2018

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author)

Share on WhatsApp

2038/2015 Const. P. Ashraf Suleman (Petitioner) V/S IXth ADJ (South), Karachi & others (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Shafi Siddiqui(Author) Order Date: 14-MAY-18

in order to avail a remedy under section 14 of the SRPO, 1979 the applicant/landlord is required to establish his personal need. In that case there would be no distinction left between section 14 and 15(2)(vii) of the SRPO, 1979 and the object of scheme and the purpose for which it was provided would be frustrated. The provisions of Section 14 is meant for a particular class of a landlord and hence the burden of establishing bona fide requirement or even a requirement was lifted. Section 14 has its own barrier and it is not an un-probed provision. Subsection (2) of Section 14 of the SRPO provides that nothing in this subsection shall apply where the landlord has rented out a building after he has retired or attained the age of 60 years or, as the case may be, i.e. landlord has become widow or orphan. Advocates: Islamuddin(ADVO-4054-SBC-KHI),Adnan Usman(ADVO-9736-SBC-KHI),Muhammad Ali Lakhani(ADVO-13611-SBC-KHS),Mohammad Ali Waris(ADVO-4491-SBC-KHC)

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.
This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

Related judgments

Arbitration Judgment in Aviation Case by Supreme Court of Pakistan

PLJ 2018 SC 504 · Sindh High Court · 2018

Contract which is in its nature revocable cannot be specifically enforced

PLJ 2016 · Sindh High Court · 2016

Review of Order of Board

PLJ 2013 · Sindh High Court · 2013

Contents of Plaint are important for Rejection of Plaint

PLJ 2009 · Sindh High Court · 2009

Termination of Agency of Contract

PLJ 2007 · Sindh High Court · 2007