2/2021 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAIN NAB (Appellant) V/S RAI TALAT MAQBOOL AHMED & ORS (Respondent)
Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author)
2/2021 Cr.Acctt..Acq. A. THE STATE THROUGH CHAIRMAIN NAB (Appellant) V/S RAI TALAT MAQBOOL AHMED & ORS (Respondent) Sindh High Court
Bench: Hon'ble Chief Justice Mr. Justice Muhammad Junaid Ghaffar(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Agha Faisal(Author) Order Date: 16-AUG-22
It is further settled that acquittal carries with it double presumption of innocence; it is reversed only when found blatantly perverse, resting upon fringes of impossibility and resulting into miscarriage of justice. It cannot be set aside merely on the possibility of a contra view. A judgment of acquittal should not be interjected until findings are perverse, arbitrary, foolish, artificial, speculative and ridiculous. Interference in a judgment of acquittal is rare and the prosecution must show that there are glaring errors of law and fact committed by the Court in arriving at the decision, which would result into grave miscarriage of justice; the acquittal judgment is perfunctory or wholly artificial or a shocking conclusion has been drawn.