1899/2021 Cr.Bail FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2022

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

1899/2021 Cr.Bail FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 07-JAN-22

Primarily, in bail matters, it is the discretion of every Court to grant the bail, but such discretion should not be arbitrary, fanciful, or perverse, as the case in hand begs a question as to what constitutes an offense under section 489-F, P.P.C. Every transaction where a cheque is dishonored may not constitute an offense. The foundational elements to constitute an offense under this provision are the issuance of a cheque with dishonest intent, the cheque should be towards repayment of a loan or fulfillment of an obligation, and lastly that the cheque in question is dishonored.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

1899/2021 Cr.Bail FARAZ TASNEEM S/O TASNEEM UR RASHEED (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28