1050/2024 Cr.Bail QASIM ANWAR S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Sindh High CourtCriminal Law2024

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author)

1050/2024 Cr.Bail QASIM ANWAR S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent) Sindh High Court

Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Order Date: 10-JUL-24

This Court ordinarily does not interfere with the progression of the trial to avoid discussion and remarks on the merits of the case as held in the case of Ehsan Akbar v. The State and 2 others (2007 SCMR 482). It has been long settled by the Supreme Court that when the trial is likely to commence or begin, bail application should not be decided on merits, and the matter be left to the trial Court because it may prejudice the case of either party. On the aforesaid proposition, I am guided by the decisions of the Supreme Court in the cases of Muhammad Sadik & others vs The State 1980 SCMR 203, Muhammad Ismail vs Muhammad Rafiq PLD 1989 SC 585, Mian Dad vs The State 1992 SCMR 1418, Gohar Rehman vs Muhammad Tahir 2011 SCMR 815.

Full judgment text for this case is not yet available on Pakistan Law Reports. Check the official Sindh High Court case law portal for the complete order.

This judgment is reproduced from a publicly available source for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. If you believe this listing contains an error, let us know.

1050/2024 Cr.Bail QASIM ANWAR S/O MUHAMMAD ANWAR (Applicant) V/S THE STATE (Respondent)

Related judgments

Red Notices against Foreign National Proclaimed Offender

Article 140- Cross Examination of a Witness

Re-Examination is more important than Examination in Chief

Further Inquiry in case of 17(1)(2) and 22(b) Emigration Ordinance 1979

PLJ 2018 Islamabad 28